Is Sanskrit A Dead Language and is the Devnagri script of the Aryans derived and evolved from the original ancient Brahmi script of Dravidians (Brahmi :- Sanskrit Lipi)?


Please refer to my related article( ) penned today on the subject, on my Facebook timeline.
There is also a conference on “Sanskrit As A Language of Science” today at IIC, New Delhi., presided over by Mr.Katju, Press Council of India.

Sanskrit is called a dead language by some uninformed people because it is not presently spoken by the majority of Indians,except priests, and mostly during religious rituals.

However, it is WRONG to call it dead, as most North Indian languages are derived from it and it is related to ancient Greek and Latin, hence being useful in the study and understanding of Indo- European languages, as well as learning of Ancient Science.

In fact, each Sanskrit word contains its meaning within itself, which English does not do. As a simple example, the Sanskrit word ‘Bahishkaar'(बहिष्कार), which means ‘boycott’, contains within it two parts – ‘Bahish’ (Out) and ‘Kaar’ (Do or Make), which bring out its meaning clearly. Whereas, do the components of the corresponding English word, boycott, viz. ‘ boy’ and cott’ make any sense, or convey the meaning of the word? That shows that it is a corrupted and less accurate or comprehensible than Sanskrit !

Moreover, It is heard that it’s Devnagari script is also supposed to be more suitable for typewriting than the Roman or other scripts, and covers many pronunciations unknown to the Roman or English script and not reproducible therein, such as ‘ण’ /ऋ, hence it is high time that it got a boost!

( However, it may interest the readers to know that the Dravidian scripts, especially Tamil and Malyalam offer a vaster option of pronunciations in their alphabet and script,as the Assyrians – Asuras? – , and Sumerians, ancient Mesopotamian or Dravidian races, who introduced the art of writing by devising the cuneiform or Brahmi script, before the Rigvedi Aryans developed the Sanskrit or Devanagari script, which is also said to be a derivative of the Brahmi (Indus Valley?)script, but Devanagari evolved into its own finer form subsequently.

Some authors on the other hand, claim that the Devnagri Script ( not the language), has been derived from the Aramaic script, but it is possible that it originated from the Brahmi script, but evolved subsequently through the medium of the Aramaic script to become an almost totally different script.This is quite possible as many of the original Aryans were Migrating people, whereas the people of the Indus Valley and Mesopotamian valleys had already got down to a settled lifestyle, and lived in cities, which is necessary for stability and development of any civilization, and skills.

The Brahmi script of which Tamil Brahmi is a variant, is the earliest Indian alphabetical script. The cuneiform script has been adopted in its various dialects by almost all countries, except a few who still use the older hieroglyphic or picturesque script of Egyptians, Chinese and Japanese. It is a pity therefore that the Dravidian language Tamil ( orig. Dhrumil ) has been given a back seat in India, and should be revived. However, it is the fault of the Southerners, particularly Tamilians in that they chose to strive for maintaining their autonomy rather than to assert the importance of, and promote, their own language. And it is learnt that Tamil itself has become Sanskitised over the years and is not like its original form any more. A Tamil friend told me that if she told me her name ‘Rajarajeshwari’ in original Tamil, it would be ‘Manamantunevi’, which is totally incomprehensible!

I am disappointed that except for Tamilians, none of the other Southern states like Andhra, Telangana , Karnataka and Kerala are bothered about the importance of their language like Tamilians.

Some years back, I was trying to learn Bengali too, and in the process, I observed that the language is definitely Aryan, and the consonants are derived from the Sanskrit Devnagri script,but the pronunciations of vowels like ‘a, e, I, o, u’ (आ इ ई उ ऊ ए, ऐ ओ औ) are written in the way of the Dravidian language Tamil, which also I have learnt (in elementary form, that is, with the same type of strokes for ‘kaana, maatra’,Etc. This shows a definite Brahmi or Dravidian influence on Bengali, which may have come during the time of Ashoka, as there are forms of Brahmi called Ashokan Brahmi and Northern Brahmi. Truly intriguing!

All said and done, let me make it clear that the Aim of this article is not to undermine the importance of ENGLISH in our educational institutions or in Government Offices for administrative correspondence. It is a long-used language and is here to stay, FOREVER, even after the end of the British Rule. and to play down the importance or applicability of the language, as a mere baggage of the ‘English Rulers’, will be like ‘throwing the Baby with the bathwater’.br<br<br<br<br
dence product, studying in a Convent school, I must honestly say that I enjoyed reading their lovely 'Radiant Readers' that we used to get at the beginning of every scholastic year, with their glossy, fresh- smelling pages, and the vivid, bright pictures of it used to take me mentally to the depicted sites. I missed the books after Independence for a while, and I, being a child then, was disappointed to see the drab books we started getting in contrast, in Free India!

Yet I realised in due course that Freedom is Freedom, no matter what, and we should be proud of it, if others are to respect us. There are no two minds about it!

Dr. Usha Padiyar


3 responses »

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s